Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas Says Federal Marijuana Laws ‘May No Longer Be Necessary’

He cited a 2005 ruling.

Clarence Thomas, the only African American on the Supreme Court, said that federal laws against marijuana may not be necessary.

According to NBC News, the court declined to hear the appeal of a Colorado medical marijuana dispensary that was denied federal tax breaks, however, the conservative judge wrote, "A prohibition on interstate use or cultivation of marijuana may no longer be necessary or proper to support the federal government's piecemeal approach.”

RELATED: Clarence Thomas Dissent Over SCOTUS Election Ruling Hints Partisanship

He also added, "Federal policies of the past 16 years have greatly undermined its reasoning. The federal government's current approach is a half-in, half-out regime that simultaneously tolerates and forbids local use of marijuana.”

Thomas cited a Supreme Court's ruling in 2005 upholding federal laws making marijuana possession illegal as being dated, explaining, "Under this rule, a business that is still in the red after it pays its workers and keeps the lights on might nonetheless owe substantial federal income tax.”

Under federal tax law, cannot businesses are not allowed to deduct their business expenses.

Latest News

Subscribe for BET Updates

Provide your email address to receive our newsletter.

By clicking Subscribe, you confirm that you have read and agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge our Privacy Policy. You also agree to receive marketing communications, updates, special offers (including partner offers) and other information from BET and the Paramount family of companies. You understand that you can unsubscribe at any time.